Middle America's Worldview

Q: How could Neandertal man be too advanced for evolution?

A: In southern France, they recently found evidence of human habitation hundreds of feet deep within a cave. What makes this find so important is that it’s been dated as the earliest signs of humans in Europe. Only the Neandertals were thought to be the inhabitants of Europe at that time.
What they found in the cave was astonishing for such so-called “primitive” people. They found a “complex quadrilateral artificial structure consisting of specially arranged pieces of stalactite and stalagmite.” Also found was a piece of burned bear bone.

Now for the problem. The items were so deep in the cave, that the people would have had to have some kind of artificial light, such as a fire, torch or lamp. Also, the structure they found was so complex, it would have required the builders to be able to communicate with each other.

Such language skill and technological know-how easily fits the creationist understanding of Neandertals. They were a line of early humans living after the Flood and descended from Noah—but evolutionists have long held that Neandertals could not possibly have done these things.

Neandertals may be a problem for the evolutionists, but not for those who believe in Genesis.
Full article found here.
---------

Part of the above news can be seen at the bottom of this site.I have pasted it here.
NEWS: Fifty stone tools made and used by Neandertals in Ukraine have been found to have microscopic residues of wood, starch, and other organic substances. The residues on the bases of teardrop-shaped scrapers and combination spear-point/knives indicate that they were hafted on wood handles. Residues on the working edges and sharp tips of these tools show that they were used to process both plants and animals, including waterfowl. These artifacts came from two sites that date 37,000-32,000 and 80,000-40,000 years ago respectively. This evidence is important because it shows that Neandertals were more capable and flexible in tool making and food acquisition than had generally been thought. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences September 11, 2001)